Wednesday, January 16, 2008

eureka! maybe

Oh my god. Am I the first person to be drawing this analogy I'm about to draw?! I feel like Benjamin Franklin discovering electricity or something. I'm probably not the first. I'm surely the fiftieth. I thought I was the originator of "_________y Mc _________erson". Without a doubt I was not.

Nonetheless!

It's perfect. It's not perfect. It's almost perfect. I think it's good. It's good. It's good enough.

During the Democratic debate last night -- now I'm Isaac Newton -- an apple fell on my head and I understood that:






and also - Oedipal, but






so naturally








and for extra credit we feature








which leads to





and since the lily has already been gilded to within an inch of its life and the idea is getting sort of cheapened and diluted from the first relatively pristine group of three you might as well but I'm sure I'll wish I didn't just because it's not very elegant or surprising






Yeah. Three is way better than six. Unless four through six are totally out of left field.

4 comments:

Felicia said...

LOL Now that was a fun HP montage :)

john said...

So Dodd is Seamus Finnigan and Biden is Dean Thomas?

Fred Thompson is, uh, Crabbe? McCain is Goyle?

cadiz12 said...

that's awesome. i can totally see fred thompson's childhood pics looking a little like goyle. or crabbe. i can't keep 'em straight.

Laurie said...

I don't know why, but that snarly photo of Cheney always makes me very, very happy.